27 October 2009

Guess I’m not that great at interviewing

Yesterday, I received a formal rejection from the investment arm of a large conglomerate, which is one of the few jobs that I truly considered despite its lower compensation (in comparison to banking/private equity).  I don’t even know.  I thought my interview went pretty well; my interviewers seemed genuinely interested in and impressed by my mathematical background. I complimented them on an investment that I found through research, asked about their take on the future of US refineries, and told them I wanted to join them because I thought the position is one of the best opportunities for young graduates to work on the buy side (truth).  Argh, I don’t know what went wrong.  Perhaps some of my answers (especially to behavior questions like “Tell me about a failure of yours”) weren’t good enough.  I’m planning to call my interviewer to try and get some feedback.

This rejection isn’t putting doubt into how I did last Friday though.  A couple days ago, I got a response to my thank you e-mail saying that the interviewer group found me quite impressive. *crosses fingers really really hard*

Other than that, there’s a bulge bracket bank and middle market bank recruiting for their investment banking division on my school’s job board site.  I also signed up for Doostang but so far, there’s barely any jobs that fit my criteria…. hopefully some will show up so I don’t waste my money on the site >.<

24 October 2009

First and only superday

I just got back from final rounds at a middle market investment banking firm in NYC.  Recruiting hasn’t been going as well as I’ve had hoped.  I have no more interviews and I never moved past the phone screen for the bulge bracket firm.  The alumnus who gave me my phone screen really liked me and a VP that I know there put in a good word for me.  Unfortunately though, I still didn’t get picked for a first round and I strongly believe it’s because I listened to my school’s career center.  They told me to take off my GMAT score because it made me sound like I was only looking for a two year stint before I head off to b-school.  I hemmed and hawed for a good ten minutes before I finally gave in.  I feel so stupid.  Every interview I’ve had, the GMAT score has been a strong positive and perhaps had I had it on my resume, I might’ve gotten the edge to get a first round.  My friend says the career center might have been trying to level the playing field for the three other BU students who were selected.  I don’t know; I really wish I had gotten an interview with the firm…

So the only bank I’ve interviewed with is this middle market investment bank.  The opportunity arose on a Wednesday when my friend stopped me at school and goes “Hey, my friend at XXXX is looking to get some BU students into her firm.  Let’s go to the computer lab and submit your resume”.  Since then, I’ve gone through a first round in their Boston branch and now a final round in New York City.  I felt a bit insecure today hearing all the other kids talk about how they’ve been on two-four other superdays.  I got glimpses at their resumes and didn’t see a GPA below a 3.7 (my GPA is a 3.3).  But I feel pretty confident that I impressed my interviewers.

My first interviewer was extremely perceptive and that made him rather tough.  He was impressed with the Silver Lake Private Equity Case Competition, experience at a VC fund, interview at the private equity firm (even if it’s a sourcing model), and GMAT score (“I have to say, you’re the only person I’ve ever met with a higher score than mine”).  I didn’t even get a technical question from him because he told me he could tell I know my stuff and he only asks those types of questions if he believes the interviewee won’t get it right.  Besides that though, he noticed that I have many interests and asked me whether I could go through 3 years focusing solely on investment banking.  He also asked me why not sales and trading given my aptitude for mathematics and interest in poker.  ”I can imagine you’re also trying hard to get into another venture capital / private equity firm; why are you here?”.  He also really grilled me on my one weak point, the GPA.  Tough questions that really got down to the point of whether I am a good fit for investment banking.  Definitely made me think but I reasoned my way out of those negative conclusions (e.g. I want a strong financial modeling skills and at the VC firm, they do barely any of that / I’m more interested in the fundamentals of business and ibanking deals with corporate strategy.  S&T on the other hand does very cursory analysis etc etc etc).  I think it went well  though

The rest of the interviewers were all really nice.  While there were some kids from Ivy-league schools, I felt like I had a leg up on them because they struggled with finance/accounting questions.  One kid was talking to another about how he got stumped on “How could Net Income be larger than Operating Income?”  It’s a pretty basic answer: gains/losses on asset sales, FX trading, etc but I guess if you haven’t taken an accounting course you might not know (though he said he took a financial accounting class at his liberal art school?).

For me, those questions, as my first interviewer predicted, were really easy.  ”What are the ways to value a company?”  I impressed the Leveraged Finance dude by talking about how DCF can be further split into three methods: adjusted present value, dividend discount, and WACC.  It was all really basic and I found the questions to be not much harder than what I would expect from an exam at school.  The only brain teaser I got was pretty simple too.

After the interview, I went to visit my sister.  She works at bulge bracket bank as a proprietary trader.  Stepping on to the trading floor right after my day at an investment bank made it very apparent the differences between the two cultures.  The trading culture is abrasive.  My sister’s co-worker, who I’ve met before, played poker with, etc, just kept tooling on me.  I was telling my sister how that guy wouldn’t ask me a technical question and how I asked for a brain teaser because I enjoy doing them.  Immediately my sister’s co worker impersonates me in nerdy manner to illustrate how big of a tool I am for requesting a brain teaser (touche).  Then someone yells for him from across the rows of monitors and he goes “What?? …….The fuck you want??”  He’s also the guy that responded to my thank you e-mail with “I feel that you’re wasting your time with this e-mail because I can’t get you a job” and told me to get the fuck out of his apartment because I answered a phone call from my girlfriend at the poker table (fyi, he’s been with his girl since college and he has no problems holding her purse).   Apparently he’s like this to his new analysts too.  His response: “yeah but XXXX takes it really well!” and then goes tell his analyst that he’ll take him seriously once he stops looking like a (fucking?) baby (the guy is >6′ tall, must be like 200 lbs, but has a baby face).  Elle – oh – elle.

After that, we played poker.  My sister’s co-worker pulls up a spread sheet, we all gather round a wood board placed on top of a trash can and start playing cards.  Buy in $100.  Game was so loose and easy. Made $225 profit in the hour that we played.  This one guy was playing pretty loose aggressive however he never knew how to back off.  Another guy just played loose passive.  All I had to do was sit, wait for good hands, and bet big because they would call me down.  The profits went all to my sister though because she’s the one who backed me.

I don’t know.  I think I would really fit in more with a trading environment.  Chilling at my sister’s place reminded me of my friends in high school.  We were all mostly children of immigrants, smart, and competitive.  We use to play poker in the back of pre-calc class together and compete on things as trivial as Tetris on our calculators.   When we played online poker we’d keep a stack of chips to shuffle in our hands just like my sister co-worker does at his trading desk.  The investment banker culture is not like this at all.  I guess being a client facing business, they’re much more polite.  They’re also mostly white and I didn’t get a sense of competition in their culture.  However, that can be good.  When you’re working 100 hours a week, the coworker who greets you with “the fuck you looking at?” probably gets annoying real fast.

Alright off to sleep.  Hopefully I’ll have some good news to post about soon.

28 September 2009

Fall Recruiting

At the end of my summer internship, my boss said I would be really busy with recruiting in the Fall.  I dismissed the notion as I commonly underestimate the time commitment of things.  However, he was dead right.  Fall recruiting is extremely time consuming.  Every day there’s some info session, meet & greet, or networking event that I feel obligated to attend.  Along with student organizations and four advanced math classes, I am rather overwhelmed (my computer dying on me doesn’t help either).

The interviews I’m really looking to get are A.T. Kearney and GE Energy Financial Services.  They might not be the places to make >$100k starting out, but I expect I would learn a lot at both.  Supply chain management hasn’t been a huge interest of mine in the past, but I’m taking an operations research class right now and enjoying it.  GE’s EFS also seems great.  From what I get, GE EFS is their energy investment arm and in that program, analysts do a lot of financial modeling, risk analysis, valuations, etc.

Also, I expect those would be really great jobs to get me into a good MBA program. Time to sleep, will update once I complete my first interview: Oct 9th!

17 September 2009

A premature celebratory post

I have two interviews!  Okay, actually it’s more like one and three-quarters.  One is for a private equity firm in Boston.  They invest in growth equity stage companies and they are known for their outbound sourcing/cold-calling (I’m sure you can guess from the details).  The other is a bulge bracket bank in NYC for their sales & trading division.  I hesitate to count that as a full interview because I’m not actually guaranteed one.  A few BU alumni at the bank banded together to interview BU students and they’re going to push the students they select for a first round interview.  Last night I had a phone interview with an alumnus and was selected to continue on.  So with any luck, I should be heading down to NYC for an official first-round interview!  Will post more about how I do and when I get my first offer.  One thing I will note is that networking was key in cultivating both these opportunities.  I’ll elaborate more later.

dilbert1

7 September 2009

GMAT Study Strategies: the little insight I have from my experience

Ever since blogging about my GMAT studies, I have intended to retain the tips and strategies that I’ve picked up while studying to share on this blog.  Unfortunately, I didn’t pick up many but I think the few that I did pick up are still useful.  So without further ado…

Verbal

My weakest sections in the GMAT are  Sentence Correction and Reading Comprehension.  The Official Guide offers little to no strategy on how to improve, especially Reading Comprehension.  Here’s what I found worked for me:

  • Active Reading — My personal preference with Reading Comprehension is to read the passage first before looking at the questions.  While reading, I looked for three things of the passage: 1) the purpose (comparing & contrasting, arguing, debunking, etc), 2) the meaning (do I understand enough to explain the passage to someone else), and 3) the structure (what is the first paragraph about? How do these points relate to the rest of the passage?). Of course I didn’t fully 100% understand the passage after the first time I read it over, but a quick run-through while actively considering these things made referencing back to the passage a whole lot faster.  Also, essentially all Reading Comprehension questions fall under these three categories: purpose, meaning, or structure.  Often times I already answered the question before I even read it.
  • Understanding why a choice is right is just as important as knowing why the other choices are wrong — While some people suggest choosing the answer that “sounds right” when doing Sentence Correction, I prefer to have a reason why choice A, B, D, & E are wrong along with a reason why choice C is right.  If you read back on my entries, it’s pretty apparent that grammar is not my strong suit and, consequently, what “sounds right” to me is often grammatically incorrect or awkward. Of course, this is easier said than done, but I found that a lot of times I would reconsider answer choices if I didn’t specifically figure out why that choice was wrong.  That can be a huge waste of time in a standardized exam.  Also I rather choose “what sounds right”, which I feel is only marginally better than random guessing, out of two choices than five choices.

Quantitative

For me, the lack of any calculus in the math section made the math rather easy, and consequently, I only have one strategy / tip for studying math: do a lot of practice problems.  However, I did pick up a few nuances about doing practice problems:

Practice Problems

The Official Guide also doesn’t give too much guidance on how to go about practice problems.  This is how I went about them:

  • Do practice problems in large chunks — 41 problems at a time, 50 problems at a time, whatever.  I believe we all have a limit on how much we can focus on a certain topic, so make sure the number of practice problems you do build up your mental stamina to handle at least one section of the exam.
  • Do some chunks at your pace, then start timing yourself While I was really proud of myself for solving some really tough math problems, after doing my second practice test on GMATPrep I learned that I was spending too much time on the math section.  It’s important to put 100% effort to solve a problem because if you get it wrong, it’s easier to learn why you got it wrong (as opposed to “I had no idea; I guessed; I got it wrong”)
  • Do the practice problems in reverse order if you find them too easy — The first time I studied for the math section, I thought the stuff was too easy.  Then I did the problems from the reverse order (240,239, …) and realized all the easy problems are put in the front.  That also explained why no matter how many practice problems I did with the Sentence Correction, I felt like I was never improving (because as I got better the questions got harder).

Habits

The difference between my SAT scores and my GMAT scores are huge, and I feel like it’s largely attributed to habits.  If I were to take a guess, the most significant habit to take up would be reading.  Though blogs are nice, I would stay away from them.  News publications, magazines, and books are probably the best sources to get acquainted with proper grammar and vocabulary.  Also they serve as good practice grounds for critical thinking skills.  Long magazine articles usually provide a lot of critical depth into a single topic, which usually are good examples of analysis.

That’s about it.  The strategies I picked up I think are useful, but I think the biggest weight has to be placed on the habits.  It’s very hard to cram all the nuances and idioms of the English language in a short time frame.  Reading makes the slow process of learning proper grammar much easier.